Sorry I’ve been so lax lately.
For the same reasons as last time I’m delaying (temporarily!) any drastic change my sleeping pattern – this really isnt a good time to be feeling sub-optimal at school. The extra time awake – even if it came at the obvious price – last week was incredibly useful, particularly one time where I was required to complete 10 hours of mundane work in a night (couldn’t've seen it coming but it had to be done). But for the next couple of months I need my brain and myself in the same place at all times.
So my theories about all this (yes I have actually learned something, I think): it’s possible. As soon as I start entering REM sleep within 4 minutes, this works fine. I was probably going about it the wrong way though. Take the (relatively) commonly attempted uberman pattern, adaptation period is about a week, assuming perfect discipline. i.e. it takes a week of sleep deprivation to enter REM within 20 minutes. I therefore assume that entering REM in 4 would take about 10-14 days to achieve.
Going that long without decent sleep probably isn’t going to do you any favours: it makes stuffing everything up far more likely and, even assuming the best case scenario, the recovery peroid (the one in which you feel… not quite fantastic but getting better with each nap… kind of thing) is likely to be much longer. When I try this next I’ll have adapted to uberman first. Being already used to entering REM quickly should make this achievable.
As I found out in the last couple of days of my last attempt (see last post), it is definately possible to enter REM in 4 minutes, and that was enough to keep me energetic for nearly two hours. It only happened the one time, despite the fact that I didn’t oversleep afterwards (for the next couple of days) but that’s enough. I know it’s possible. “I’ve seen the light… And it was warm.” (First part misquoted, I know. I’m sorry.)
The following formula came rather out of the blue so it could be complete bullshit, but it’s consistent with my knowledge of sleep (however limited) and I’m yet to find anything wrong with it). Nap length required for an equiphasic pattern (this excludes everyman) is determined by:
t(s) = 60K / n^[log(4,6)+1]
where t(s) is the time in minutes per sleep, n is the number of sleeps per 24 hours and K is what I call the “slackness factor” – purely by coincidence (*cough*) it happens to be exactly equal to the number of hours one would ideally sleep if they were monophasic. This also assumes that the person is actually adapted to whatever pattern they’re on. I hope that it’s readable, however badly laid out it is. The log function is read as “log of 4 to base 6″, ie log4 / log6, and is roughly equal to 0.7737. (Just mentioned that since I’ve no idea how to write logs without a subscript and I probably got something wrong.)
For those who hate maths the approximation (well actually they’re both approximations since we don’t really know what the actual relationship is) is:
t(s) = 60K / N^1.7737
By the way… this means that, in terms of efficiency, the ideal sleeping pattern is an infinite number of infinitesimal naps. Total nap time there being 0! So I can’t see any reason to stop at 16.
I still find all this very interesting so if I have any interesting (id est insane) ideas in the meantime I’ll be sure to post them. There’s a 95% chance I’ll get impatient and start this in the middle of november (I have nothing important on from that time onwards), but my current intention is to adapt to uberman starting dec 12. I’ll be interrupted about 5 times over the following weeks, but a start is a start and I’ll get there.
Now, to quote a friend of mine to finish off:
“You’re insane
“I’d say you’re a bloody loon
“You’re more insane than I am
“…this person is insane”
He’s clinically insane, so I’m so very proud!